Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Horrmann et al., as Trustees under the Will of Joseph Rubsam, Deceased, Plaintiffs; v. Cornelius Ferguson, Jr., as Executor of Joseph Stehlin, Deceased, et al., Respondents. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Company, Appellant; Mamie Curran et al., Respondents, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 544 · caselaw · US
General
William Horrmann et al., as Trustees under the Will of Joseph Rubsam, Deceased, Plaintiffs; v. Cornelius Ferguson, Jr., as Executor of Joseph Stehlin, Deceased, et al., Respondents. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Company, Appellant; Mamie Curran et al., Respondents
186 N.Y. 544·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Horrmann et al., as Trustees under the Will of Joseph Rubsam, Deceased, Plaintiffs; v. Cornelius Ferguson, Jr., as Executor of Joseph Stehlin, Deceased, et al., Respondents. Rubsam & Horrmann Brewing Company, Appellant; Mamie Curran et al., Respondents.
Horrmann v. Furgueson, 112 App. Div. 920, affirmed.
(Argued October 3, 1906;
decided October 23, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the •Supreme Court m the second judicial department, entered April 20, 1906, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee in surplus money proceedings.
William D. Gaillard and Thomas G. Prioleau for appellant
George G. Case for respondents. '
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlelt, Haight, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.