Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph F. Guffey et al., Petitioners, v. James A. Smith et al.; and Joseph F. Guffey et al., Petitioners, v. Susannah Smith et al., 1913 — 227 U.S. 677 · caselaw · US
General
Joseph F. Guffey et al., Petitioners, v. James A. Smith et al.; and Joseph F. Guffey et al., Petitioners, v. Susannah Smith et al.
227 U.S. 677·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 902.
Joseph F. Guffey et al., Petitioners, v. James A. Smith et al.; and Joseph F. Guffey et al., Petitioners, v. Susannah Smith et al.
No. 903.
February 24, 1913.
Mr. Joseph-IF.. Bailey, Mr. J. II. Beal, Mr. 'Levy Mayer and Mr. J. IF • Moses for the petitioners.
Mr. Jay A. Hindman, Mr. John W. Kern and Mr., Abram Simmons for the respondent. .
[MAJORITY]
Petitions for writs of. certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit granted.