Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Flora Belle Dyer, as Administratrix of Charles E. Dyer, Deceased, Respondent, v. William H. Brown et al., Appellants, 1902 — 170 N.Y. 616 · caselaw · US
General
Flora Belle Dyer, as Administratrix of Charles E. Dyer, Deceased, Respondent, v. William H. Brown et al., Appellants
170 N.Y. 616·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Flora Belle Dyer, as Administratrix of Charles E. Dyer, Deceased, Respondent, v. William H. Brown et al., Appellants.
Dyer v. Brown, 64 App. Div. 89, appeal dismissed.
(Argued March 24, 1902;
decided April 1, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered September 5, 1901, which reversed an order of the court at a Trial Term setting aside and vacating a verdict in favor of plaintiff and the judgment entered - thereon and granting a new trial and directed judgment upon the verdict.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction to hear the appeal.
D. Haymond Cobb for motion.
Charles L. Stone opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.