Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UTILITIES HOLDING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, IOWA, et al., Appellees, 1933 — 63 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
Corporations
UTILITIES HOLDING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, IOWA, et al., Appellees
63 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UTILITIES HOLDING CORPORATION, Appellant, v. CITY OF OSCEOLA, IOWA, et al., Appellees.
No. 9688.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 18, 1933.
John N. Hughes, of Des Moines, Iowa (Donnelly, Lynch, Anderson & Lynch, of Cedar Rapids, Iowa, and Hughes, O’Brien & Faville, of Des Moines, Iowa, on the brief), for appellant.
O. M. Slaymaker, of Osceola, Iowa (R. E. Killmar, of Osceola, Iowa, on the brief), for appellees.
Before KENYON, and SANBORN, Circuit Judges, and REEVES, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of the District Court overruling an application of appellant, Utilities Holding Corporation, for a temporary injunction against appellees to restrain them from proceeding in a certain alleged action pending in the state court which attacks appellant’s telephone rates and franchises in the city of Osceola, Iowa. We are satisfied the trial court committed no error in its ruling, and its order and decree is affirmed.