General
Sophia Quigley, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant
151 N.Y. 626·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sophia Quigley, Respondent, v. The City of Rochester, Appellant.
Quigleys. Qity of Rochester, 79 Hun, 609, affirmed,
(Argued October 23, 1896;
decided December 1, 1896.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered June 29,1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term setting aside a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and granted a new trial.
A. J. Rodenbeck for appellant.
Werner & Harris for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against the defendant, with costs, on opinion of trial judge.
All concur. •