General
Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco et al.
351 U.S. 916·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 731.
Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Association et al. v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco et al.
Charles K. Chapman for the Long Beach Federal Savings & Loan Assn, et al., and F. Henry NeCasek for the Home Investment Co., appellants. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Samuel D. Slade and Donald B. Mac-Guineas for McAllister et al., and Sylvester Hoffmann for the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, appellees. Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General of California, and Everett W. Mattoon, Assistant Attorney General, filed a brief on behalf of the citizens of California, as amici curiae, in support of appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.[]
[As amended, post, p. 922.]