Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stewart, Administrator, v. Southern Railway Co., 1942 — 315 U.S. 784 · caselaw · US
General
Stewart, Administrator, v. Southern Railway Co.
315 U.S. 784·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 161.
Stewart, Administrator, v. Southern Railway Co.
March 9, 1942.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
Upon petition for rehearing, it appearing that the case has been settled, the petition is granted and the judgment entered February 16, 1942, 315 U. S. 283, is vacated. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed with costs and the case is remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the suit as moot.