Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Clarence E. Collins, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of New Hampshire, 1902 — 187 U.S. 636 · caselaw · US
General
Clarence E. Collins, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of New Hampshire
187 U.S. 636·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 15.
Clarence E. Collins, Plaintiff in Error, v. State of New Hampshire.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Hew Hampshire.
Argued and submitted January 7 and. 8, 1902. Restored to docket for reargument January 20, 1902. Reargued April 17, 1902;
November 10, 1902.
Mr. Wm. D. Guthrie and Mr. A. H. Veeder for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Eclwm G. Eastman for the defendant in error.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, by an equally divided court.