Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chorak et al. v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc. et al., 1952 — 344 U.S. 887 · caselaw · US
General
Chorak et al. v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc. et al.
344 U.S. 887·Supreme Court of the United States·1952
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Reed, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 135,
Misc.
Chorak et al. v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc. et al.
Alfred C. Ackerson for petitioners.
Eugene D. Williams for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Reed, and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.