Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Henry W. Box et al., Respondents, v. John H. Costello, Appellant, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 591 · caselaw · US
General
Henry W. Box et al., Respondents, v. John H. Costello, Appellant
149 N.Y. 591·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Henry W. Box et al., Respondents, v. John H. Costello, Appellant.
Box v. Costello, 9 Misc. Rep. 736, affirmed.
(Argued April 23, 1896;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Buffalo, entered July 3, 1894, which affirmed a' judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the court, a jury trial having been waived.
Geo. W. Cothran for appellant.
John G. Milburn and Jesse H. Behrends for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.