Contracts · MBE-tested
MINISTERS LIFE & CASUALTY UNION v. HAASE, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE, et al.
385 U.S. 205·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument. · Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MINISTERS LIFE & CASUALTY UNION v. HAASE, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE, et al.
No. 634.
Decided December 5, 1966.
Erwin N. Griswold for appellant.
Bronson C. La Follette, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and E. Weston Wood, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and H. Warren Siegel, Deputy Attorney General, for the State of California, as amicus curiae, in support of appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.
Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.