Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Long Island Railroad Co. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al., 1978 — 435 U.S. 912 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Long Island Railroad Co. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al.
435 U.S. 912·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-688.
Long Island Railroad Co. v. Aberdeen & Rockfish Railroad Co. et al.
[MAJORITY]
The application for a stay of the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in case No. 77-1054, presented to Mr. Justice Powell, and by him referred to the Court, is granted, only insofar as the judgment requires applicant Long Island Railroad Company to keep in a separate trust fund the proceeds of the interim 12.5 per cent terminal surcharge, pending the timely filing of a petition for writ of certiorari. Should a timely petition for writ of certiorari not be filed or be denied, this stay is to terminate automatically. If the petition for writ of certiorari is granted, this stay is to remain in effect pending the judgment of this Court. In all other respects,' the application for stay is denied.
Mr. Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.