General
Samuel D. Coykendall, Respondent, v. Abram Constable et al., Appellants, Impleaded, etc.
117 N.Y. 627·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel D. Coykendall, Respondent, v. Abram Constable et al., Appellants, Impleaded, etc.
(Argued October 10, 1889;
decided October 29, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made May 17, 1888, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee,
John J. Linson for appellants.
S. L. Stebbins for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion,
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.