General
Davis v. Cecil, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals
384 U.S. 915·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 844,
Misc.
Davis v. Cecil, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals.
Petitioner pro se. Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Geo. E. Mason, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Michigan that a copy of the transcript of the United States District Court has been furnished the petitioner, and it appearing from the papers on file that the petitioner has received the relief he sought, the motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.