Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Arkansas Valley G & T, Inc., et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 857 · caselaw · US
General
Arkansas Valley G & T, Inc., et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
393 U.S. 857·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 184.
Arkansas Valley G & T, Inc., et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
Wallace L. Duncan, Stephen A. West, and J. A. Riggins, Jr., for petitioners.
Solicitor General Griswold, Peter H. Schiff, and William H. Arkin for respondent Federal Power Commission; Reuben Goldberg for respondent Minnkota Power Cooperative, Inc.; and William C. Wise for respondents Committee of Rural Electric Cooperatives et al.
Raphael J. Moses and John J. Conway for Tri-State Generation & Transmission Association, Inc., as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Motion of Tri-State Generation & Transmission Association, Inc., for leave to file a brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Certiorari denied.