Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY et al., Executors, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY COMPANY et al., Defendants, Appellees, 1928 — 30 F.2d 1015 · caselaw · US
General
OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY et al., Executors, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY COMPANY et al., Defendants, Appellees
30 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OLD COLONY TRUST COMPANY et al., Executors, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. UNITED SHOE MACHINERY COMPANY et al., Defendants, Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
July 11, 1928.
No. 2227.
Edward E. McClennen and Francis J. V. Dakin, both of Boston, Mass., for appellants.
Hector M. Holmes and Fish, Richardson & Neave, all of Boston, Mass., for appellees.
Before BINGHAM, JOHNSON, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel, it is ordered that this ease be, and the same hereby is, dismissed, without costs.