Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David C. Andrews et al., Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. Harry V. Osborn, Trustee, etc., 1915 — 239 U.S. 629 · caselaw · US
General
David C. Andrews et al., Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. Harry V. Osborn, Trustee, etc.
239 U.S. 629·Supreme Court of the United States·1915
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 57.
David C. Andrews et al., Copartners, etc., Appellants, v. Harry V. Osborn, Trustee, etc.
Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Argued November 5, 1915.
Decided November 8, 1915.
Mr. Sigmund Solomon and Mr. David C. Myers for the appellants.
Mr. Nathan Bilder for the appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of First National Bank v. Littlefield, 226 U. S. 110, 112; Texas & Pacific Ry. v. Louisiana R. R. Commission, 232 U. S. 338; Greey v. Dockendorff, 231 U. S. 513.