Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edward R. Booth, Appellant, v. Carrie H. Fordham et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 535 · caselaw · US
General
Edward R. Booth, Appellant, v. Carrie H. Fordham et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others
185 N.Y. 535·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward R. Booth, Appellant, v. Carrie H. Fordham et al., Respondents, Impleaded with Others.
Booth v. Fordham, 100 App. Div. 115, affirmed.
(Argued April 5, 1906;
decided May 1, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment entered June 11,1905, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the-Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, which reversed an order of .the court at a Trial Term setting aside a verdict in favor of defendants and granting a new trial and directed 'judgment for the defendants upon the • verdict in an action for the partition of farm lands.
George P. Decker for appellant.
John P. Morse for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Werner and Chase, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J. Not sitting: Hiscock, J.