General
Hoey, doing business as Midland Service Co. v. United States et al.
308 U.S. 510·Supreme Court of the United States·1939
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 431.
Hoey, doing business as Midland Service Co. v. United States et al.
October 23, 1939.
Mr. Lloyd C. Whitman for appellant. Messrs. Daniel W. Knowlton and Edward M. Reidy for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motion for a stay is denied. The decree is affirmed. Interstate Commerce Comm’n v. Union Pacific R. Co., 222 U. S. 541, 547-548; Los Angeles Switching Case, 234 U. S. 294, 311-312; United States v. American Tin Plate Co., 301 U. S. 402, 411.