Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hutcherson et al. v. Lehtin et al., 1970 — 400 U.S. 923 · caselaw · US
General
Hutcherson et al. v. Lehtin et al.
400 U.S. 923·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1385,
October Term, 1969.
Hutcherson et al. v. Lehtin et al.,
[MAJORITY]
399 U. S. 522. Petition for rehearing granted and order of June 29, 1970, vacated. Judgment recalled and a new judgment entered vacating the judgment of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California ana case remanded to that court so that it may enter a fresh order dismissing the complaint, thus affording appellants an opportunity to take a timely appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.