Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of VICTORY ICE & ICE CREAM CO., Bankrupt. CHICAGO ICE CREAM COMPANY v. Peter CHRISTENSEN, 1933 — 67 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of VICTORY ICE & ICE CREAM CO., Bankrupt. CHICAGO ICE CREAM COMPANY v. Peter CHRISTENSEN
67 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of VICTORY ICE & ICE CREAM CO., Bankrupt. CHICAGO ICE CREAM COMPANY v. Peter CHRISTENSEN.
No. 5051.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Oct. 11, 1933.
Joseph Rosenberg, of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.
Thomas J. Symmes, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.
Before EVANS, SPARKS, and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for appellee, counsel for appellant in open court consenting thereto, it is now here ordered, adjudged, and decreed by tihis court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.