Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, petitioner, v. INDYMAC MBS, INC., et al., 2014 — 135 S. Ct. 41 · caselaw · US
General
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, petitioner, v. INDYMAC MBS, INC., et al.
135 S. Ct. 41189 L. Ed. 2d 893·Supreme Court of the United States·2014
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI, petitioner,
v.
INDYMAC MBS, INC., et al.
No. 13-640.
Supreme Court of the United States
Sept. 23, 2014.
Opinion
[MAJORITY]
Parties are directed to file letter briefs addressing the following question: 'What should be the effect, if any, of the proposed settlement agreement now pending before the district court on the matter pending before this Court?' Briefs are limited to 10 pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before noon, Thursday, September 25, 2014.