Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nathanson v. United States, 1944 — 321 U.S. 746 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Nathanson v. United States
321 U.S. 746·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 560.
Nathanson v. United States.
February 7, 1944.
[MAJORITY — “Per Curiam:]
The order entered January 31st, ante, p. 744, is amended to read as follows:
“Per Curiam:
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is vacated and the cause is remanded to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri with directions to proceed in conformity with the Act of December 23,1943, c. 377, 57 Stat. 608, but without prejudice to the consideration of any questions which petitioner may wish to raise as to the validity or application of that Act.”