Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles W. Tillinghast, as Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. The Troy and Boston Railroad Company et al., Respondents, 1890 — 121 N.Y. 649 · caselaw · US
General
Charles W. Tillinghast, as Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. The Troy and Boston Railroad Company et al., Respondents
121 N.Y. 649·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles W. Tillinghast, as Trustee, etc., Appellant, v. The Troy and Boston Railroad Company et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 11, 1890;
decided April 15, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made May 17, 1888, which reversed order of Special Term denying motions for stay of proceedings, and granted said motions.
Esek Oowen for appellant.
Charles E. Patterson and John B. Gale for respondents. ■.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.