Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sophia Brown, Individually and as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. Lafayette J. Finch, Appellant, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 671 · caselaw · US
General
Sophia Brown, Individually and as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. Lafayette J. Finch, Appellant
133 N.Y. 671·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sophia Brown, Individually and as Executrix, etc., Respondent, v. Lafayette J. Finch, Appellant.
(Argued May 23, 1892;
decided June 7, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made March 31, 1892, which affirmed an order of Special Term appointing a referee herein.
Louis V. Booraem for appellant,
Hoffman Miller for respondent,
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.