Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Poe et al. v. Ullman, State's Attorney; and Buxton v. Ullman, State's Attorney, 1960 — 364 U.S. 859 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Poe et al. v. Ullman, State's Attorney; and Buxton v. Ullman, State's Attorney
364 U.S. 859·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. Osmond K. Fraenkel for movants.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 60.
Poe et al. v. Ullman, State's Attorney; and Buxton v. Ullman, State's Attorney.
No. 61.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 362 U. S. 987.) The motion of the American Civil Liberties Union and the Connecticut Civil Liberties Union for leave to file brief, as amici curiae, is granted.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion. Osmond K. Fraenkel for movants.