Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Mississippi et al., 1965 — 379 U.S. 952 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Mississippi et al.
379 U.S. 952·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 73.
United States v. Mississippi et al.
Joe T. Patterson, Attorney General of Mississippi, Dugas Shands, Assistant Attorney General, P. M. Stockett and Charles Clark, Special Assistant Attorneys General, and Aubrey Bell on the motion.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 377 U. S. 988.) The motion of the appellees to strike portions of the brief and to strike the appendix to the brief of the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, is denied.