Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Stevens v. Marks, New York Supreme Court Justice; Stevens v. McCloskey, Sheriff, 1965 — 382 U.S. 809 · caselaw · US
General
Stevens v. Marks, New York Supreme Court Justice; Stevens v. McCloskey, Sheriff
382 U.S. 809·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 210.
No. 290.
Stevens v. Marks, New York Supreme Court Justice. Stevens v. McCloskey, Sheriff.
Gerard E. Maloney for petitioner.
Frank S. Hogan and H. Richard Uviller for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
App. Div., Sup. Ct. N. Y., 1st Jud. Dept.; and
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petitions which reads as follows:
“1. Is Article 1, Section 6 of the New York State Constitution and Section 1123 of the New York City Charter repugnant to the United States Constitution in that any public officer who refuses to sign a waiver of immunity and claims a privilege against self-incrimination suffers a penalty of loss of his public position and is barred from public employment for five years under the New York State Constitution and forever under the New York City Charter?”
The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument.
Reported below: No. 210, 22 App. Div. 2d 683, 253 N. Y. S. 2d 401; No. 290, 345 F. 2d 305.