Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1968 — 392 U.S. 928 · caselaw · US
General
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
392 U.S. 928·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1410.
Midwestern Gas Transmission Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
W. C. Braden, Jr., Harry S. Littman, Melvin Richter, Jack Werner, Dale A. Wright, Harold L. Talisman, and Harry R. Begley for petitioners.
Solicitor General Griswold, Richard A. Solomon, Peter H. Schiff, and Israel Convisser for respondent Federal Power Commission, and Christopher T. Boland, Thomas F. Brosnan, George J. Meiburger, and Harry L. Albrecht for respondent Independent Natural Gas Association of America.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.