Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Francis H. Duehay, Petitioner, v. The District of Columbia, 1905 — 198 U.S. 586 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Francis H. Duehay, Petitioner, v. The District of Columbia
198 U.S. 586·Supreme Court of the United States·1905
(Mr. Justice Brewer took no part in the consideration and disposition, of this application.)
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 638.
Francis H. Duehay, Petitioner, v. The District of Columbia.
May 29, 1905.
Mr. Samuel Maddox for petitioner.
Mr. A. B. Duvall and Mr.. F. H. Stephens for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals, of the District of Columbia denied.
(Mr. Justice Brewer took no part in the consideration and disposition, of this application.)