Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Benjamin R. French, Plaintiff, v. Elizabeth French et al., Respondents, and George C. Helfert et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 532 · caselaw · US
General
Benjamin R. French, Plaintiff, v. Elizabeth French et al., Respondents, and George C. Helfert et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others
185 N.Y. 532·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Benjamin R. French, Plaintiff, v. Elizabeth French et al., Respondents, and George C. Helfert et al., Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
French v. French, 107 App. Div. 107, appeal dismissed.
(Argued April 16, 1906;
decided April 24, 1906.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment entered July 19, 1905, upon an order .of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, affirming a portion of an interlocutory judgment of Special Term and an order awarding co'sts in an action of partition.
The motion was made upon the ground that the Court of Appeals had no jurisdiction to consider the appeal, it being from an interlocutory judgment in partition.
John D. Collins for motion.
U. C. Sholes opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten dollars costs of motion.