Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corporation et al., 1955 — 350 U.S. 920 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corporation et al.
350 U.S. 920·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 6, 1955.
No. 509.
Lawlor et al., trading as Independent Poster Exchange, v. National Screen Service Corporation et al.
Francis T. Anderson for petitioners. Louis Nizer for the National Screen Service Corporation, Wm. A. Schnader, Bernard G. Segal and Edward W. Mullinix for the Columbia Pictures Corporation et al., and Louis J. Goff man for the Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corporation, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Dismissed per stipulation pursuant to Rule 60 of the Rules of this Court.