Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Chicago Car Heating Company, Appellant, v. Gold Car Heating & Lighting Company, 1917 — 245 U.S. 631 · caselaw · US
General
Chicago Car Heating Company, Appellant, v. Gold Car Heating & Lighting Company
245 U.S. 631·Supreme Court of the United States·1917
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 47.
Chicago Car Heating Company, Appellant, v. Gold Car Heating & Lighting Company.
Appeal from- the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois.
Submitted November 9, 1917.
Decided November 19, 1917.
Mr. Otto Raymond Barnett for appellant.
Mr. William A. Redding, Mr. Edward Rector and Mr. Arthur C. Frazer for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of Green v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Ry. Co., 205 U. S. 530; W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co., 236 U. S. 723.