Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
T. SMITH & SON, Inc., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, 1933 — 63 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
T. SMITH & SON, Inc., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
63 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
T. SMITH & SON, Inc., v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.
No. 6494.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 18, 1933.
Nicholas Callan, of New Orleans, La., for petitioner.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., Sewall Key and Wm. Cutler Thompson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and R. P. Hertzog, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for respondent.
Before BRYAN, POSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard upon the joint stipulation of counsel that the above entitled and numbered cause be reversed and remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals and that a final order may be entered that there is a deficiency for the year 1920 in the sum of $4,228.72 and that there is a deficiency for the year 1921 in the sum of $9,846.32, and that the said deficiency may be assessed and collected immediately without regard to the restrictions, if any, contained in the Revenue Acts of 1926,1928, and 1932 (see 26 USCA).
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the order of the United States Board of Tax Appeals of February 28, 1931, in the above entitled and numbered cause, be reversed, and that said cause be remanded to the United States Board of Tax Appeals that a final order may be entered that there is a deficiency for the year 1920 in the sum of $4,228.72 and that there is a deficiency for the year 1921 in the sum of $9,846.32, and that the said deficiency may be assessed and collected immediately without regard to the restrictions,, if any, contained in the Revenue Acts of 1926, 1928, and 1932.
It is further ordered and adjudged that, the mandate of this court issue without delay..