Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
American Trading and Production Corp. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al., 1959 — 361 U.S. 886 · caselaw · US
General
American Trading and Production Corp. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.
361 U.S. 886·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 387.
American Trading and Production Corp. v. Railroad Commission of Texas et al.
Thurman Arnold, Abe Fortas, Robert E. H-erzstein and Harry S. Pollard for petitioner. Will Wilson,’ Attorney General of' Texas, and Houghton Brownlee, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the Railroad Commission of Texas, Rayburn L. Foster and Harry D. Turner for Phillips Petroleum Co., and Raymond A. Lynch for Baxter et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Third Supreme Judicial District. Certiorari denied.