General

Felix Reyes, Appellant, v. Jose M. Esquilin, Respondent, et al., Defendants

54 A.D.3d 615866 N.Y.S.2d 4·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2008·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Felix Reyes, Appellant, v Jose M. Esquilin, Respondent, et al., Defendants. [866 NYS2d 4] [MAJORITY] Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered July 5, 2007, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for lack of a serious injury as required by Insurance Law § 5102 (d), unanimously affirmed, without costs. Flaintiff failed to present objective medical evidence responsive to defendants’ showing that the MRIs of plaintiff taken shortly after the accident revealed only age-related degenerative changes, not any sudden trauma that can be causally related to the accident (see Pommells v Perez, 4 NY3d 566, 579 [2005]; Ronda v Friendly Baptist Church, 52 AD3d 440 [2008]; Becerril v Sol Cab Corp., 50 AD3d 261 [2008]). Absent such evidence, it does not avail plaintiffs 90/180-day claim that defendants’ experts did not address his condition during the relevant period of time (see Blackwell v Fraser, 13 AD3d 157, 157 [2004]; cf. Webb v Johnson, 13 AD3d 54, 55 [2004]). Concur—Lippman, P.J., Tom, Williams, McGuire and Freedman, JJ.