Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Abram M. Roos, Appellant, v. Henrietta Tremper, Respondent, 1891 — 129 N.Y. 623 · caselaw · US
General
Abram M. Roos, Appellant, v. Henrietta Tremper, Respondent
129 N.Y. 623·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Abram M. Roos, Appellant, v. Henrietta Tremper, Respondent.
(Argued October 22, 1891;
decided December 1, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made February 9, 1891, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term and ordered a new trial.
W. F. O’Neill for appellant.
B. R. Champion for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm order, and judgment absolute ordered for defendant on stipulation; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed, and ordered accordingly.