Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Harry REIMAN and Samuel Licht, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Strand Silk Mills, Bankrupts; George Wolf, Appellant, William C. Hecht, Jr., Trustee-Appellee, 1930 — 38 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of Harry REIMAN and Samuel Licht, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Strand Silk Mills, Bankrupts; George Wolf, Appellant, William C. Hecht, Jr., Trustee-Appellee
38 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Harry REIMAN and Samuel Licht, Copartners Doing Business under the Firm Name and Style of Strand Silk Mills, Bankrupts; George Wolf, Appellant, William C. Hecht, Jr., Trustee-Appellee.
No. 220.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Feb. 17, 1930.
George Wolf, of New York City (David V. Cahill, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Benjamin Siegel, of New York City, for trustee-appellee.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND) Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order affirmed.