General
Edward Ruskin et al., Formerly Known as the Copartnership of Ruskin & Hayman, Respondents, v. Max E. Orloff, Appellant
268 A.D. 859·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1944·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Ruskin et al., Formerly Known as the Copartnership of Ruskin & Hayman, Respondents, v. Max E. Orloff, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order unanimously reversed, with costs, and the motion denied, on the ground that a triable issue of fact is presented. Present — Martin, P. J., Townley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.