Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Florida ex rel. Hawkins et al. v. Board of Control of Florida et al., 1951 — 342 U.S. 877 · caselaw · US
General
Florida ex rel. Hawkins et al. v. Board of Control of Florida et al.
342 U.S. 877·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 325.
Florida ex rel. Hawkins et al. v. Board of Control of Florida et al.
Robert L. Carter and Thurgood Marshall for petitioners.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and Frank J. Heintz, Ralph M. McLane and Howard S. Bailey, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida denied for want of a final Judgment.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice Douglas are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.