General
Mary Teckemeyer, Respondent, v. The Supreme Council, Royal Templars of Temperance, Appellant
163 N.Y. 568·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary Teckemeyer, Respondent, v. The Supreme Council, Royal Templars of Temperance, Appellant.
Teokemeyer v. Supreme Gouncil B. T. of T, 25 App. Div. 631, affirmed.
(Argued May 1, 1900;
decided May 15, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in favor of-plaintiff February 14, 1898, upon an order of the Appellate Division in the fourth judicial department, affirming an order of the Trial Term denying a motion for a new trial, after a verdict had been found in favor of plaintiff.
A. C. Harwich and J. H. Tatem for appellant.
WilUam L. Jones for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur : Parker, Ch. J., Gray, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and, Werner, JJ.