Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles Miller, Respondent, v. New York City Railway Company, Appellant, 1908 — 192 N.Y. 552 · caselaw · US
General
Charles Miller, Respondent, v. New York City Railway Company, Appellant
192 N.Y. 552·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles Miller, Respondent, v. New York City Railway Company, Appellant.
Miller v. New York City Railway Co., 119 App. Div. 879, affirmed.
(Argued April 16, 1908;
decided May 19, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered April 29, 1907, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff through his unlawful ejectment from a street car.
Martin E. Burke, Anthony J. Ernest and Henry A. Robinson for appellant.
G. Washbourne Smith for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Vann, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.