General
Evelena Dunning, Respondent, v. Edgar F. Dunning and Lillie E. Henderson (Impleaded with Joseph M. De Veau et al., as Executors, etc.), Appellants
147 N.Y. 686·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Evelena Dunning, Respondent, v. Edgar F. Dunning and Lillie E. Henderson (Impleaded with Joseph M. De Veau et al., as Executors, etc.), Appellants.
Reported below, 83 Hun, 463.
(Argued June 14, 1895;
decided October 8, 1895.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made November 13, 1894, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Henry A. Brann and A. Britton Havens for appellants.
William G. Bussey and Daniel Wkitford for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.