Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Washington L. Cleveland et al., Respondents, v. Charles E. Hequembourg, Appellant, 1879 — 78 N.Y. 607 · caselaw · US
General
Washington L. Cleveland et al., Respondents, v. Charles E. Hequembourg, Appellant
78 N.Y. 607·New York Court of Appeals·1879·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Washington L. Cleveland et al., Respondents, v. Charles E. Hequembourg, Appellant.
(Argued. April 9, 1879 j
decided September 16, 1879.)
Decided on the facts in the case.
Samuel Hand for appellant.
O. D. Murray for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Eolger, J.,]
Eolger, J.,
reads for reversal and new trial, unless plaintiffs stipulate to reduce the recovery in the amount of two allowances made to them of $655.35 and $806.41, in which event judgment, as so modified, affirmed, without costs to either party.
All concur.
Judgment accordingly.