Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Estate of Mary T. De Forest, Deceased. John J. Gallogly et al., as Executors, Appellants; Mary M. De Forest et al., Respondents, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 544 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Estate of Mary T. De Forest, Deceased. John J. Gallogly et al., as Executors, Appellants; Mary M. De Forest et al., Respondents
189 N.Y. 544·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Estate of Mary T. De Forest, Deceased. John J. Gallogly et al., as Executors, Appellants; Mary M. De Forest et al., Respondents.
Matter of Me Forest, 119 App. Div. 782, affirmed.
(Argued September 30, 1907;
decided October 15, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered May 8, 1907, which affirmed an order of the Rensselaer County Surrogate’s Court directing the executors to pay the respondents herein certain sums of money claimed to be due under an agreement made with the testatrix.
John II. Burhe and John B. Holmes for appellants.
Arthur L. Andrews and CharlesF. Bridge for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs payable out of estate; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.