Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Daniel W. Tallmadge et al., Appellants, v. Phineas C. Lounsbury, as Treasurer, etc., of the Republican League of the U. S., Respondent, 1891 — 126 N.Y. 655 · caselaw · US
General
Daniel W. Tallmadge et al., Appellants, v. Phineas C. Lounsbury, as Treasurer, etc., of the Republican League of the U. S., Respondent
126 N.Y. 655·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Daniel W. Tallmadge et al., Appellants, v. Phineas C. Lounsbury, as Treasurer, etc., of the Republican League of the U. S., Respondent.
(Argued April 13, 1891;
decided April 28, 1891.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Eew York, made March 2, 1891, which .affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by plaintiffs to vacate judgment.
Alexander 8. Bacon for appellants.
James A. Blanchard for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.