General
Kunigunda Fandel, Respondent, v. The Third Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant
162 N.Y. 598·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Kunigunda Fandel, Respondent, v. The Third Avenue Railroad Company, Appellant.
Fandel v. Third, Avenue R. R. Co., 15 App. Div. 426, affirmed.
(Argued February 6, 1900;
decided February 27, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 29, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Herbert R. Limburger, Henry L. Scheuerman and Henry Siegrist, Jr., for appellant.
Edmund Luis Mooney, Robert P. Harlow and M. P. O'Connor for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.