General

United States v. Photo Marketing Corp.

2 Cust. Ct. 871·United States Customs Court·1939

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

United States v. Photo Marketing Corp. No. 4533. Invoices dated Lutjensee, Germany, June 21, August 3, 1938. Certified June 22, August 4, 1938. Entered at New York July 2, August 13, 1938. Entry Nos. 700486, 716625. (Decided March 6, 1939) Webster J. Oliver, Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Auster, special attorney) , for the plaintiff. Walden & Webster for the defendant. [MAJORITY — Sullivan, Judge:] Sullivan, Judge: These appeals to reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto. In harmony with the stipulation I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values are as follows: Film Viewers K. F. — 22.80 R. M., less 33)4%, less 2%, plus packing as invoiced. Film Frames and Projection apparatus — 5 R. M. per set, less 33⅝%, less 2% plus packing as invoiced. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.