Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Atlas Life Insurance Co., 1965 — 379 U.S. 988 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.
379 U.S. 988·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 489.
United States v. Atlas Life Insurance Co.
Solicitor General Cox on the motion to enlarge the time for oral argument. Norris Darrell for respondent. Jack P. F. Gremillion, Attorney General of Louisiana, John J. O’Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Daniel B. Goldberg on the motion for leave to participate in the oral argument.
[MAJORITY]
(Certiorari, ante, p, 927, to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit.) The motion of the Solicitor General to enlarge the time for oral argument is granted and a total of one hour is allotted to the petitioner. Counsel for the respondent is allotted a total of forty-five minutes for oral argument. The motion of the Attorney General of Louisiana et al. for leave to participate in the oral argument on behalf of the . respondent, as amici curiae, is granted.