Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening, etc., Relative to the Opening of 127th Street from the Boulevard to Manhattan Street in the City of New York, 1893 — 139 N.Y. 657 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening, etc., Relative to the Opening of 127th Street from the Boulevard to Manhattan Street in the City of New York
139 N.Y. 657·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of the Board of Street Opening, etc., Relative to the Opening of 127th Street from the Boulevard to Manhattan Street in the City of New York.
(Argued October 16, 1893;
decided October 27, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made the first Monday of April, 1893, which reversed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee and which sustained exceptions thereto on the part of the petitioner.
George G. Munger for appellants.
Henry A. Powell for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.